|
Previous
| Next
| Home
Intro | Content Analysis | Audience | Economics | Ownership | News Investment | Public Attitudes | Conclusion | Charts & Tables
| Guest Essay
Guest Essay
A Year to Remember in Internet News
By Merrill Brown
The year 2004 demonstrated both the opportunity for the Internet
news business to bring millions of news consumers extraordinary
coverage of both politics and world affairs and the threat
the Web itself poses for those who make that coverage possible.
For while Internet news sites continued to play a growing
role in how people get their news and information, their viability
has been called into question by the emergence of literally
thousands of bloggers, community journalists and news tools
starting what amounts to a revolution in newsgathering.
It was a year to remember in Internet news, but the shape
of the medium and the future of the news industry grew murkier
by the month. And while the role of the Internet as a dominant
medium never seemed more certain and Internet advertising
set new records, most Internet news managers acknowledge that
there is in fact little evidence of growth, hiring, creativity
or other advances in Internet journalism.
It was an election year in which 63 million Americans accessed
political news online and 31% of Internet broadband customers
described the Web as their primary source of political news,
according to the Pew Internet & American Life Project.
That's double the total for the national election just four
years ago. To be sure, Internet news sites had strong years
in viewership and sales. Internet advertising continued its
dramatic growth; the Interactive Advertising Bureau reported
that for the first three quarters of 2004 the medium pulled
in over $7 billion compared to $7.3 billion for all of 2003.
The annual figure was expected to exceed $8.4 billion.
But ultimately those successes and accomplishments were not
the story. On the institutional end, the parent companies
of most successful news sites and journalism in general were
the story. Evidence of the erosion of credibility and readership
intensified amid fundamental questions about the viability
of big-city newspapers. The wave of scandals about the accuracy
and character of news coverage and journalists continued.
And the news business, even at institutions of extraordinary
impact, quality and financial capabilities, continued to erode
as new forms of both content and advertising gained more and
more audience and commerce.
Over the past two years, for instance, The Washington Post's
daily circulation has dropped 10% even as its market thrived
and an intense election year grabbed the attention of the
paper's community, while advertising alternatives like CraigsList
began to significantly erode historic newspaper revenue streams.
At the same time, RSS (Really simple syndication) feeds and
sites that aggregate the work of news organizations like Google
News are drawing meaningful numbers of news viewers without
directly providing the funding for Internet news sites to
actually prosper.
So while news institutions struggled to map their futures,
what became clearer than ever in 2004 was the emergence of
a decentralized media universe. New forms of journalism evolved
in ways that weren't widely anticipated. Much of the attention
on the Internet as a news source moved away from large institutional
news sites to the world of the blog. In 2004 reporting in
blogs prompted the CBS News scandal involving Dan Rather and
the network's use of documents it could not verify in reporting
about the military record of President George W. Bush. CNN's
chief news executive, Eason Jordan, resigned after bloggers
jumped on him for seeming to suggest, at the Davos economic
conference in January of 2005, that members of the U.S. military
fired on reporters in Iraq.
The journalism of bloggers had enormous impact in 2004 and
on into 2005, and some writers from blogs gained national
profiles, such as Ana Marie Cox, the blogger known as Wonkette,
who became a television pundit. Cox, obscure as recently as
2003, found herself appearing as an NBC news analyst during
political convention coverage.
At the same time, a serious-minded grassroots, community
journalism movement gained momentum as Mark Potts, one of
the founders of Washingtonpost.com, launched Backfence.com,
a venture designed to create ad-supported neighborhood news
sites throughout the country. And the San Jose Mercury News
columnist Dan Gillmor published a widely discussed book, "We
the Media: Grassroots Journalism By the People, For the People,"
and left the paper at year's end to encourage more citizen-based
media. Newspapers like the News & Record in Greensboro,
N.C. and The Bakersfield Californian began important experiments
in creating new forms of journalism with community participation.
In the larger Internet universe there was a stream of intriguing
business developments. The Washington Post Company bought
Slate.com for an undisclosed price. Dow Jones Inc. acquired
CBS Marketwatch for a stunning $519 million. Yahoo demonstrated
its commitment to building consequential news and original-content
products by hiring the founding editor and publisher of Wall
Street Journal Online, Neil Budde.
So, while business might appear prosperous, beneath the success
lies a perplexing reality. Many of the news organizations
that make most Web site journalism possible, either through
their dollars or the work of the journalists reporting for
their traditional products, are in some combination of strategic,
journalistic and financial peril. It is those organizations
that make large-scale Internet news sites viable. In a world
of dwindling resources, a world of falling daily newspaper
readership and fragmented television news audiences, who will
produce the journalism of scale and importance that informs
citizens about national political campaigns and international
conflict? Bloggers? Citizen journalists? The software developers
who produce RSS readers?
The answers that emerge over this decade to those questions
are certain to impact the future not just of Internet news
but of journalism itself.
Media industry consultant Merrill Brown was from 1996
to 2002 founding Editor in Chief of MSNBC.com, and previously
was a founder and Senior Vice President of Court TV, a magazine
editor and a reporter and Wall Street Correspondent for The
Washington Post.

Previous
| Next
| Home
Intro | Content Analysis | Audience | Economics | Ownership | News Investment | Public Attitudes | Conclusion | Charts & Tables
| Guest Essay
|