|
Previous
| Next
| Home
Intro | Content Analysis | Audience | Economics | Ownership | News Investment | Public Attitudes | Conclusion | Charts & Tables
| Guest
Essay
Intro
By the Project for Excellence in Journalism
The challenge for cable news is that it has now reached adulthood.
Most cable systems in the country now carry all three of
its news channels, CNN, Fox News and MSNBC, so the field cannot
grow merely from new distribution. The majority of Americans
now cite cable over broadcast as the source they turn to for
breaking news. More Americans also say they trust cable than
they do commercial television news. The medium comes at us
in airports, on our phones and PDAs, in the air. Its Web sites
are among the Internet's most popular, though not the most
sophisticated. The cable news channel CNN outweighs any other
television news organization in bureaus and resources. And
cable news is enormously profitable, since, unlike broadcaster
news, it gets substantial revenue from both subscriptions
and advertising.
Yet building brand may look like the easy part from now on.
In the last three years audience growth measured properly
has slowed almost to a stop. And much of the recent growth,
analysts say, has come from adding new cable systems that
carry the channels, not from winning new viewers away from
broadcast. That growth has gone almost as far as it can. CNN,
which reached saturation distribution a few years ago, has
been losing viewers since. From now on, experts say, cable
channels will steal viewers mainly from each other, unless
they can change their content to broaden their appeal.
For now, the content of cable news is measurably thinner,
more opinionated, and less densely sourced than other forms
of national news. Much of the appeal of cable lies in its
convenience, and that may soon be challenged by the Web as
it moves in the next year or two toward searchable video.
The advantage of owning one of the three cable channels may
diminish.
The question for cable news from now on may be how it defines
news. The menu of topics that get substantive coverage on
cable is fairly narrow. The channels, when examined closely,
really focus on three or four major topics a day, and the
level of repetition is enormous.
Much of the time, cable news is engaged in a different kind
of news from much of the rest of the media - a journalism
of assertion, where information is disseminated with only
minimal attempts to check it out. None of the cable channels,
for instance, offers what might be described as a signature
evening newscast where people can go to authoritatively understand
the events of the day. Each cable news network has something
that most closely mirrors an evening newscast, but even these
do not compare, our content analysis shows, to what is available
on broadcast television.
The new leadership at MSNBC is already trying to contend
with the problem of repetition in its quiet remaking of its
own programming. The new leadership at CNN has gone on record
as saying that it wants to get out of the shout-show business
in favor of storytelling. At the close of 2004, it cancelled
the iconic program that helped define the shout genre, Crossfire,
and the new president of CNN even said he sided with the comedian
Jon Stewart, who had gone on the show as a guest and criticized
it harshly.
In a sense, the cable channels need to decide what comes
first, programming or journalism. Are they going to be focused
around something different from news - something that might
be called nonfiction TV - airing the product that generates
the highest audience at the lowest cost? Or do they believe,
now that growing is going to get harder, that they need to
take their journalism to a level they have not reached before
to survive the leap to the next technology?
Previous
| Next
| Home
Intro | Content Analysis | Audience | Economics | Ownership | News Investment | Public Attitudes | Conclusion | Charts & Tables
| Guest
Essay
|